GPT-3.5 vs. GPT-4: Core Differences Explained
Natural language processing (NLP) is a branch of artificial intelligence that deals with understanding and generating natural language texts. One of the most impressive and popular NLP models is GPT, which stands for Generative Pre-trained Transformer. GPT is a deep neural network that can learn from large amounts of text data and produce coherent and diverse texts on various domains and tasks, such as writing essays, summarizing articles, composing emails, creating stories, and more. GPT has been evolving over the years, with each new version surpassing the previous one in terms of performance and capabilities. The latest versions of GPT are GPT 3.5 and GPT 4, which are both state-of-the-art models that can generate amazing texts. However, they are not identical and have some important differences that users should be aware of. In this article, we will compare and contrast GPT 3.5 and GPT 4 and highlight their strengths and weaknesses.
GPT-3.5 vs. GPT-4
GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 are two of the most advanced language models developed by OpenAI. They can both generate human-like text and perform various tasks such as chat, summarization, translation, and more. However, there are some key differences between them that make GPT-4 superior to GPT-3.5 in many aspects. Here are some of the core differences explained:
Model size and training data
GPT-4 has a much larger model size than GPT-3.5, with a (rumored) 1 trillion parameters compared to 175 billion parameters for GPT-3.5. This means that GPT-4 can handle more complex tasks and generate more accurate responses. This is thanks to its more extensive training dataset, which gives it a broader knowledge base and improved contextual understanding.
Creativity
While GPT-3.5 can generate creative content, GPT-4 goes a step further by producing stories, poems, or essays with improved coherence and creativity. For example, GPT-4 can produce a short story with a well-developed plot and character development, whereas GPT-3.5 might struggle to maintain consistency and coherence in the narrative.
Image or visual inputs
While GPT-3.5 can only accept text prompts, GPT4 is multi-modal and can accept both text and visual inputs. This means that GPT4 can understand and describe almost any image, such as a handwritten math problem or a meme. It can also generate code from an image of a mockup website.
Emotion recognition and response
While GPT-3.5 is quite capable of generating human-like text, GPT4 has an even greater ability to understand and generate different dialects and respond to emotions expressed in the text. For example, GPT-4 can recognize and respond sensitively to a user expressing sadness or frustration, making the interaction feel more personal and genuine.
Safer responses
While GPT-3.5 has some safety measures to prevent harmful or offensive outputs, such as moderation and filtering, GPT-4 has a more proactive approach to safety. It uses techniques such as alignment learning and debiasing to ensure that its outputs are aligned with human values and do not contain biases or stereotypes.
These are some of the main differences between GPT-3-.5 and GPT-4 that make the latter a more powerful and reliable language model. Both models are still evolving and improving over time, so we can expect more innovations and breakthroughs from OpenAI in the future.
What are some limitations of GPT-4?
GPT-4 is an impressive language model, but it is not perfect. It still has some limitations that prevent it from being fully reliable and trustworthy. Here are some of the limitations of GPT-4:
1. ChatGPT usage cap limitation: GPT4, which is publicly available via ChatGPT, currently has a usage cap limitation. Users facing this limitation are directed to use the earlier GPT-3.5 versions.
Common LLM reasoning limitation: Although GPT-4 has impressive abilities, it shares some of the limitations of earlier GPT models. It still struggles with common sense reasoning, logical inference, and factual consistency. It can also make arithmetic errors that a calculator would avoid.
2. Knowledge update limitation: GPT-4 is trained on a large corpus of text data that may not reflect the latest information or events. It does not update its knowledge in real time, which means it can produce outdated or inaccurate responses.
3. Scientific research limitation: GPT-4 is not a substitute for scientific research or experimentation. It cannot verify its own claims or hypotheses, nor can it provide evidence or citations for its statements. It can also generate false or misleading information that may harm scientific progress or public health.
4. Safety and alignment limitation: While GPT-4 has improved safety and alignment measures compared to GPT-3.5, it still faces challenges with social biases, hallucinations, and adversarial prompts. It can produce harmful or offensive content that may violate human values or norms. It can also be manipulated or exploited by malicious actors for nefarious purposes.
Users should be aware of and cautious about this main limitations of GPT-4. These limitations do not diminish the remarkable achievements and potential of GPT4. They also provide opportunities for further research and improvement in the field of natural language processing and generation.
How to overcome limitations of GPT4?
There is no definitive answer to how these limitations can be overcome, but there are some possible directions and suggestions that have been proposed by researchers and developers. Here are some of them:
ChatGPT usage cap limitation
ChatGPT usage cap limitation is mainly due to the high computational cost and demand of running GPT4. One possible way to overcome this limitation is to optimize the model architecture and inference speed, or to use more efficient hardware and software platforms. Another possible way is to distribute the workload among multiple servers or devices, or to use federated learning techniques.
Common LLM reasoning limitation
This limitation is partly due to the lack of explicit reasoning mechanisms and knowledge representation in GPT4. One possible way to overcome this limitation is to incorporate symbolic logic and reasoning modules into the model, or to use hybrid approaches that combine neural networks and symbolic systems. Another possible way is to use external knowledge sources or databases that can provide factual information and logical inference.
Knowledge update limitation
This limitation is partly due to the static nature of the training data and the lack of feedback mechanisms in GPT4. One possible way to overcome this limitation is to use dynamic and up-to-date data sources for training and fine-tuning the model, or to use online learning techniques that can update the model parameters in real time. Another possible way is to use interactive learning techniques that can solicit feedback from users or experts and incorporate it into the model.
Scientific research limitation
Scientific research limitation is partly due to the lack of scientific rigor and verification methods in GPT4. One possible way to overcome this limitation is to use peer review and evaluation systems that can assess the quality and validity of the outputs generated by GPT4, or to use meta-learning techniques that can measure and improve the model's performance on various benchmarks. Another possible way is to use collaborative learning techniques that can combine the strengths of human and machine intelligence and facilitate scientific discovery.
Safety and alignment limitation
This limitation is partly due to the complexity and uncertainty of human values and norms, as well as the potential misuse and abuse of GPT4. One possible way to overcome this limitation is to use alignment learning and debiasing techniques that can ensure that the model's outputs are consistent with human values and do not contain biases or stereotypes, or to use adversarial learning techniques that can detect and mitigate malicious inputs or outputs. Another possible way is to use ethical frameworks and guidelines that can regulate the development and deployment of GPT4, as well as its social and environmental impacts.
These are some of the possible ways to overcome the limitations of GPT4, but they are not exhaustive or conclusive. There may be other challenges and solutions that have not been explored or discovered yet. The field of natural language processing and generation is still evolving and advancing rapidly, so we can expect more innovations and breakthroughs from OpenAI and other researchers in the future.
When to use GPT 3.5 or GPT 4?
The choice between using GPT 3.5 or GPT 4 depends on several factors, such as the task complexity, the input modality, the output quality, the cost and speed, and the safety and reliability. Here are some general guidelines to help you decide:
- If you’re limited in terms of computing power, GPT 3.5 is significantly cheaper to run.
- If you need to process image inputs or generate code from images, GPT 4 is the only option that can handle this modality.
- If you need to generate creative content, such as stories, poems, or essays, GPT 4 is more likely to produce coherent and original outputs than GPT 3.5.
- If you need to perform complex reasoning or inference tasks, such as passing a bar exam or a math Olympiad, GPT 4 is more likely to produce correct and consistent outputs than GPT 3.5.
- If you need to generate factual or informative content, such as summaries or translations, GPT 4 is less likely to “hallucinate” or make factual errors than GPT 3.5. However, it takes the same amount of time for a human to fact-check and edit the text. So if speed is the priority, the older model might be the better choice.
- If you need to generate sensitive or ethical content, such as medical advice or social commentary, GPT 4 is more likely to produce safe and aligned outputs than GPT 3.5.
However, both models still face challenges with social biases, hallucinations, and adversarial prompts. So you should always use caution and verification when using them.
These are some of the main differences between GPT 3.5 and GPT 4 that can help you choose the best model for your needs. However, both models are still evolving and improving over time, so you should always keep an eye on their latest updates and features.
.png)
